TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence of Superspin-Glass Behavior in Zn0.5Ni0.5Fe2O4 Nanoparticles
AU - Botez, Cristian E
AU - Adair, Antony H
AU - Tackett, Ronald J
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - We have used dc-magnetization and ac-susceptibility to investigate the superspin dynamics in 9 nm average size Zn0.5Ni0.5Fe2O4 magnetic particles at temperatures ( T ) between 3 and 300 K. Dc-magnetization M versus T data collected in a H = 50 Oe magnetic field using a field-cooled–zero-field-cooled protocol indicate that the onset of irreversibility occurs in the vicinity of 190 K. This is confirmed by M versus H | T hysteresis loops, as well as by frequency- and temperature-resolved ac-susceptibility data. We demonstrate that this magnetic event is not due to the blocking of individual superspins, but can be unequivocally ascribed to their collective freezing in a spin-glass-like fashion. Indeed, the relative variation (per frequency decade) of the in-phase susceptibility peak temperature is ~0.032, critical dynamics analysis of this peak shift yields an exponent z ν = 10.0 and a zero-field freezing temperature T g = 190 K, and, in a magnetic field, T g( H ) is excellently described by the de Almeida–Thouless line δ T g = 1 − T g( H )/ T g ∝ H 2/3. In addition, out-of-phase susceptibility versus temperature datasets collected at different frequencies collapse on a universal dynamic scaling curve. Finally, memory imprinting during a stop-and-wait magnetization protocol confirms the collective freezing nature of the state below 190 K.
AB - We have used dc-magnetization and ac-susceptibility to investigate the superspin dynamics in 9 nm average size Zn0.5Ni0.5Fe2O4 magnetic particles at temperatures ( T ) between 3 and 300 K. Dc-magnetization M versus T data collected in a H = 50 Oe magnetic field using a field-cooled–zero-field-cooled protocol indicate that the onset of irreversibility occurs in the vicinity of 190 K. This is confirmed by M versus H | T hysteresis loops, as well as by frequency- and temperature-resolved ac-susceptibility data. We demonstrate that this magnetic event is not due to the blocking of individual superspins, but can be unequivocally ascribed to their collective freezing in a spin-glass-like fashion. Indeed, the relative variation (per frequency decade) of the in-phase susceptibility peak temperature is ~0.032, critical dynamics analysis of this peak shift yields an exponent z ν = 10.0 and a zero-field freezing temperature T g = 190 K, and, in a magnetic field, T g( H ) is excellently described by the de Almeida–Thouless line δ T g = 1 − T g( H )/ T g ∝ H 2/3. In addition, out-of-phase susceptibility versus temperature datasets collected at different frequencies collapse on a universal dynamic scaling curve. Finally, memory imprinting during a stop-and-wait magnetization protocol confirms the collective freezing nature of the state below 190 K.
KW - nanoparticles
KW - superspin freezing
KW - complex ferrites
UR - https://digitalcommons.kettering.edu/physics_facultypubs/34
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/7/076005
U2 - 10.1088/0953-8984/27/7/076005
DO - 10.1088/0953-8984/27/7/076005
M3 - Article
VL - 27
JO - Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
JF - Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
ER -